Monday, March 19, 2007
WET-FOOT, DRY-FOOT NOT A VALID DEFENSE IN BASEBALL PLAYER SMUGGLING CASE, JUDGE RULES
The "wet-foot, dry-foot" policy that permits Cubans who enter the country illegally to file for permanent residency was ruled to be an invalid defense for sports agents accused of smuggling baseball players in to the country. Defense attorneys in the case are hoping to put US immigration policy on trial. Attorney Stephen Salter had this to say about the case:
"The defense is entitled to ask the jury to consider the impact of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 and the controlling Wet Foot/Dry Foot policy on the issue of the defendant's intent," states the defense motion filed last week.
"Because the Cuban national baseball players identified in the indictment are Cuban nationals who arrived on U.S. soil, the effect of the Cuban Adjustment Act is the significant ingredient in this case that underlies the very essence of the charged crimes and the defendant's constitutional right to contest those charges."
Defense also argued that, contrary to prosecutors' assertions, Cuban refugees do not have to notify immigration officials of their presence in the United States before seeking admittance under the Cuban Adjustment Act.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 10:50 PM
Comments:
Post a Comment
XML newsfeed
archives
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
July 2011
August 2011
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
October 2012
November 2012
January 2013
July 2013
September 2013
December 2013
January 2014
April 2014
May 2014
July 2014
"The defense is entitled to ask the jury to consider the impact of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 and the controlling Wet Foot/Dry Foot policy on the issue of the defendant's intent," states the defense motion filed last week.
"Because the Cuban national baseball players identified in the indictment are Cuban nationals who arrived on U.S. soil, the effect of the Cuban Adjustment Act is the significant ingredient in this case that underlies the very essence of the charged crimes and the defendant's constitutional right to contest those charges."
Defense also argued that, contrary to prosecutors' assertions, Cuban refugees do not have to notify immigration officials of their presence in the United States before seeking admittance under the Cuban Adjustment Act.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 10:50 PM
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
July 2011
August 2011
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
October 2012
November 2012
January 2013
July 2013
September 2013
December 2013
January 2014
April 2014
May 2014
July 2014